N.02 · Tools · Economy · MLC

MLC — Local complementary currencies

MBA LSE Essentials pedagogical personification: five experts (Friedman, Buchanan, Graham, Blanchard, Galbraith) on local complementary currencies, demurrage, company accounts, the French 2026 cashflow case, and Hungary.

MBA-LSE-DORLEANS-MLC-2026 · EN rev.36-C · FR rev.35-C · 15 August 2026 · François Dorléans · partner comments locked

MLC — local value circuit
Local circuits of value: markets, farms, greenhouses, communities — complementary to the euro, not a substitute.

Partner review (protected): each section has a #tag for deep links. Inline comments are prepared for partners and blocked for the public until unlocked (?role=partner). Content is available in all selected site languages via i18n.

1. Purpose, method and identity verification

1.0 Gelleri’s 2021 article

1.b Seven practical questions

1.c Who benefits, who pays

2. Context 2026: French national cashflow

3. Hypothetical position — Milton Friedman

4. Hypothetical position — James Buchanan

5. Hypothetical position — Benjamin Graham

6. Hypothetical position — Olivier Blanchard

7. Hypothetical position — John Kenneth Galbraith

8. Confrontation and synthesis of the five positions

9. Evaluation of the French economic lever

10. Legal framework and historical precedent

11. Case study: Hungary

12. Extrapolating the thinking and the voice of the living

13. LCCs compared to air miles: demurrage

14. Benefits for companies on the balance sheet

15. Concrete application to the French 2026 case

16. Examples of local complementary currencies

17. Hypothetical benefit curve and a management application

17.1 Benefit curve of a perfect LCC, 1770–2080

Hypothetical benefit curve of a perfect LCC, 1770–2080
Figure 17.1 — Hypothetical stacked benefit of a “perfect LCC” versus real schemes (Chiemgauer, Eusko, Sardex) and discontinued cases (Owen, Wära, Wörgl). Pedagogical construction, not an empirical forecast.

17.2 Specifications for currency X

17.3 Screen simulation — an individual’s wallet

Hypothetical MLC X wallet simulation
Figure 17.3 — Hypothetical wallet: three time-stamped batches (314 X), FIFO spend, 5% CPS sale. Not a real product, not tax advice.

17.4 Screen simulation — an employer’s payroll dashboard

Hypothetical employer P&L with currency X bonus
Figure 17.4 — Hypothetical 13-employee P&L: 70% euro base + 30% X bonus funded from local revenue; +14% local sales and −47% staff turnover shown as unverified effects.

17.5 Legal reading of the assumptions

17.6 Ledger security and bitcoin

19. Definition of acronyms

20. Real biographies and verifiable facts